Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Obama. Show all posts
Tuesday, October 20, 2009
Thursday, May 7, 2009
STATEMENT FROM RNC CHAIRMAN STEELE REGARDING PRESIDENT'S POSITION ON DC SCHOOL VOUCHERS
Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman Michael Steele released the following statement today:
“No one should be fooled into believing that President Obama’s ‘extension’ of Washington, D.C.’s school voucher program is a victory for students or a step toward better education in the District of Columbia. It’s not, and denying District schoolchildren who are currently outside of the program the right and ability to attend better schools is nothing to celebrate. If the president is serious about finding budget cuts, he should start by reducing his own proposals for reckless spending programs, not by eliminating a modest program for a limited number of children from very low-income families who otherwise would be condemned to failing schools.
The president’s decision to end the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program leaves future DC students and parents with less choice and less opportunity to get a better education.
Rather than stand up to do what is right, President Obama, who has written two books—one with a title of ‘Hope’ and the other of ‘Dreams’—has pledged to deny the hopes and dreams of poor, minority families who simply seek the opportunity that I had, the opportunity that he himself had, and the opportunity that we all seek for our own children—a better education.
The president should ask Congress to reverse course and reinstitute this important education initiative so District schoolchildren get the quality education they want and deserve.”
“No one should be fooled into believing that President Obama’s ‘extension’ of Washington, D.C.’s school voucher program is a victory for students or a step toward better education in the District of Columbia. It’s not, and denying District schoolchildren who are currently outside of the program the right and ability to attend better schools is nothing to celebrate. If the president is serious about finding budget cuts, he should start by reducing his own proposals for reckless spending programs, not by eliminating a modest program for a limited number of children from very low-income families who otherwise would be condemned to failing schools.
The president’s decision to end the DC Opportunity Scholarship Program leaves future DC students and parents with less choice and less opportunity to get a better education.
Rather than stand up to do what is right, President Obama, who has written two books—one with a title of ‘Hope’ and the other of ‘Dreams’—has pledged to deny the hopes and dreams of poor, minority families who simply seek the opportunity that I had, the opportunity that he himself had, and the opportunity that we all seek for our own children—a better education.
The president should ask Congress to reverse course and reinstitute this important education initiative so District schoolchildren get the quality education they want and deserve.”
Wednesday, April 29, 2009
Evening Newscasts Have Covered Obama More Than Bush & Clinton Combined
From the RNC:
Evening Newscasts Have Covered Obama More Than
Bush & Clinton Combined
The nonpartisan research group Center for Media and Public Affairs along with California's Chapman University released a study that found the nightly newscasts devoted 27 hours, 44 minutes to Pres. Obama's presidency in his first 50 days. That compares to 7 hours, 42 minutes for Pres. George W. Bush and 15 hours, 2 minutes for Pres. Bill Clinton during the first 50 days of their first terms.
Not only has Obama gotten more coverage, but that coverage has been more positive than his predecessors.
On the ABC, CBS, and NBC evening newscasts, 58% of all evaluations of the president and his policies have been favorable, while 42% were unfavorable. That compares with 33% positive in the comparable period of Bush's tenure and 44% positive for Pres. Clinton. …
(Source: TVNewser, April 27, 2009)
Evening Newscasts Have Covered Obama More Than
Bush & Clinton Combined
The nonpartisan research group Center for Media and Public Affairs along with California's Chapman University released a study that found the nightly newscasts devoted 27 hours, 44 minutes to Pres. Obama's presidency in his first 50 days. That compares to 7 hours, 42 minutes for Pres. George W. Bush and 15 hours, 2 minutes for Pres. Bill Clinton during the first 50 days of their first terms.
Not only has Obama gotten more coverage, but that coverage has been more positive than his predecessors.
On the ABC, CBS, and NBC evening newscasts, 58% of all evaluations of the president and his policies have been favorable, while 42% were unfavorable. That compares with 33% positive in the comparable period of Bush's tenure and 44% positive for Pres. Clinton. …
(Source: TVNewser, April 27, 2009)
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
Bill Nelson Says It'll Take Merlin to Pull Off Obama's Budget
Bill Nelson to Obama: It’ll Take Merlin the Magician to Pull Off Your Budget
Tallahassee—On Monday Democrat Senator Bill Nelson said it will take a magician—specifically, Merlin—to pull off President Obama’s budget.
When questioned about the massive budget in an interview with FOX News, Senator Nelson replied, “How we’re going to pull this off, it’s going to take Merlin the Magician.”
Nelson, a member of the Senate Budget Committee, cautioned that the Obama budget will have to be modified due to projections that federal deficits over the next ten years will exceed Obama’s projections by $2.3 trillion. Senator Nelson notes, “we’re going to have to go back and rework this whole thing…” Nelson then suggested higher taxes, saying, “…you’re going to have to speed up the revenues coming in from such things as possibly a cigarette tax, possibly…cap and trade…”
The Wall Street Journal tells Nelson, “Getting cap-and-trade legislation – opponents call it “cap and tax” — and a higher cigarette tax through Congress, however, might require more than one Merlin.”
Wednesday, March 11, 2009
In Their Own Words...
While American taxpayers are looking for answers regarding the billions of dollars in earmarks included in the new $787 billion federal stimulus package as well as the $410 billion omnibus bill signed today by President Obama, Office of Management and Budget Director Peter Orszag had this to say….
“If we can’t expect answers from President Obama’s Budget Director while he testifies before the Senate Finance Committee, and we can’t get them from President Obama himself, exactly who in the Obama Administration is being held accountable for his campaign trail promise to go through the federal budget line by line removing earmarks?” asked RPOF Chairman Jim Greer. “Republicans have been repeatedly criticized for saying ‘No’ to the Obama Administration, while it’s actually President Obama saying ‘No’ – to any answering any questions. I think it’s about time the American taxpayers said ‘No’ to footing the bill.”
“You should not expect, and you will not be receiving, definitive answers from me.”
“If we can’t expect answers from President Obama’s Budget Director while he testifies before the Senate Finance Committee, and we can’t get them from President Obama himself, exactly who in the Obama Administration is being held accountable for his campaign trail promise to go through the federal budget line by line removing earmarks?” asked RPOF Chairman Jim Greer. “Republicans have been repeatedly criticized for saying ‘No’ to the Obama Administration, while it’s actually President Obama saying ‘No’ – to any answering any questions. I think it’s about time the American taxpayers said ‘No’ to footing the bill.”
Monday, March 9, 2009
Thursday, February 12, 2009
Video: Steele on Gregg Decision to Pull Out of Commerce Sec. Consideration
...Why does this matter? Senator Gregg may have removed his name from consideration because, as the Associated Press notes, "The Commerce Department has jurisdiction over the Census Bureau, and the administration recently took steps to assert greater control.
Additionally, "Republicans have harshly criticized the decision, saying it was an attempt to politicize the once-in-a-decade event. The outcome of the census has deep political implications, since congressional districts are drawn based on population."
Watch here as RNC Chairman Michael Steele explains Gregg's possible reasons from removing himself from consideration and read Gregg's statement below.
Senator Gregg Statement on His Withdrawal for Consideration of U.S. Commerce Secretary
Sen. Gregg stated, “I want to thank the President for nominating me to serve in his Cabinet as Secretary of Commerce. This was a great honor, and I had felt that I could bring some views and ideas that would assist him in governing during this difficult time. I especially admire his willingness to reach across the aisle.
“However, it has become apparent during this process that this will not work for me as I have found that on issues such as the stimulus package and the Census there are irresolvable conflicts for me. Prior to accepting this post, we had discussed these and other potential differences, but unfortunately we did not adequately focus on these concerns. We are functioning from a different set of views on many critical items of policy.
“Obviously the President requires a team that is fully supportive of all his initiatives.
“I greatly admire President Obama and know our country will benefit from his leadership, but at this time I must withdraw my name from consideration for this position.
“As we move forward, I expect there will be many issues and initiatives where I can and will work to assure the success of the President’s proposals. This will certainly be a goal of mine.
“Kathy and I also want to specifically thank Governor Lynch and Bonnie Newman for their friendship and assistance during this period. In addition we wish to thank all the people, especially in New Hampshire, who have been so kind and generous in their supportive comments.
“As a further matter of clarification, nothing about the vetting process played any role in this decision. I will continue to represent the people of New Hampshire in the United States Senate.”
Additionally, "Republicans have harshly criticized the decision, saying it was an attempt to politicize the once-in-a-decade event. The outcome of the census has deep political implications, since congressional districts are drawn based on population."
Watch here as RNC Chairman Michael Steele explains Gregg's possible reasons from removing himself from consideration and read Gregg's statement below.
Senator Gregg Statement on His Withdrawal for Consideration of U.S. Commerce Secretary
Sen. Gregg stated, “I want to thank the President for nominating me to serve in his Cabinet as Secretary of Commerce. This was a great honor, and I had felt that I could bring some views and ideas that would assist him in governing during this difficult time. I especially admire his willingness to reach across the aisle.
“However, it has become apparent during this process that this will not work for me as I have found that on issues such as the stimulus package and the Census there are irresolvable conflicts for me. Prior to accepting this post, we had discussed these and other potential differences, but unfortunately we did not adequately focus on these concerns. We are functioning from a different set of views on many critical items of policy.
“Obviously the President requires a team that is fully supportive of all his initiatives.
“I greatly admire President Obama and know our country will benefit from his leadership, but at this time I must withdraw my name from consideration for this position.
“As we move forward, I expect there will be many issues and initiatives where I can and will work to assure the success of the President’s proposals. This will certainly be a goal of mine.
“Kathy and I also want to specifically thank Governor Lynch and Bonnie Newman for their friendship and assistance during this period. In addition we wish to thank all the people, especially in New Hampshire, who have been so kind and generous in their supportive comments.
“As a further matter of clarification, nothing about the vetting process played any role in this decision. I will continue to represent the people of New Hampshire in the United States Senate.”
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Economic Crisis Silver Lining: Everyday Heroes
Thanks to the House Majority Office for bringing this to our attention:
From Politico--
A town hall gets emotional
The Ft. Myers woman who told Obama she was living in her car with her family has reportedly been offered a home. When Obama called on Henrietta Hughes at a packed town hall in Florida, she told him:
"I have an urgent need. ... We need something more than the vehicle and parks to go to. We need our own kitchen and our own bathroom, please help."
Obama hugged Hughes and kissed her on the cheek and told her to talk to his staff after the town hall meeting.
Now MSNBC reports that Florida Rep. Nick Thompson and his wife offered Hughes their second home, rent free, after hearing about her plight.
"Basically, I offered Ms. Hughes and her son the opportunity to stay in my home rent free, for as long as they need to," said Chene Thompson. "I'm not a millionaire, I'm not rich, but this is what I can do for someone if they need it."
From Politico--
A town hall gets emotional
The Ft. Myers woman who told Obama she was living in her car with her family has reportedly been offered a home. When Obama called on Henrietta Hughes at a packed town hall in Florida, she told him:
"I have an urgent need. ... We need something more than the vehicle and parks to go to. We need our own kitchen and our own bathroom, please help."
Obama hugged Hughes and kissed her on the cheek and told her to talk to his staff after the town hall meeting.
Now MSNBC reports that Florida Rep. Nick Thompson and his wife offered Hughes their second home, rent free, after hearing about her plight.
"Basically, I offered Ms. Hughes and her son the opportunity to stay in my home rent free, for as long as they need to," said Chene Thompson. "I'm not a millionaire, I'm not rich, but this is what I can do for someone if they need it."
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Pelosi Didn't Get the Memo
From our friends at the NRCC:
DCCC Dismisses Obama’s Calls for Bipartisanship
Washington Post Editorial: Politics, Still Strangled: Did the DCCC miss Mr. Obama's memo?
SPIN CYCLE:
Pelosi Proclaimed Congress Must “Work in a Bipartisan Way and Build Consensus”
“The challenges before us are formidable. Some can be solved immediately; others will take more time.
“To solve all of them, we must govern from the middle – reaching across the aisle to work in a bipartisan way and build consensus.
“We will work together with greatest civility.” – Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Speech at Bipartisan New Member Dinner, 11/17/08
RINSE CYCLE:
Dems Only Willing to Offer up More of the Same, DCCC Plays Partisan Politics as Usual
“PRESIDENT OBAMA says he wants a new era of bipartisanship. Among the areas where he is sure to need bipartisan help are foreign aid and fixing the nation's credit system. So why is the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee taking cheap shots at Republicans for their votes in those two areas?
“The hits come in radio ads that the DCCC began running yesterday against 28 Republican incumbents for their opposition to Mr. Obama's stimulus bill. That's fair enough; the stance on the bill is a major fault line between the two parties. But the ads also contrast the Republicans' opposition to stimulus with their votes ‘to bail out big banks,’ in some cases, and for ‘building new schools in Iraq,’ in others. ‘Times are tough,’ one ad says. ‘Tell [Rep.] Thad McCotter to put American jobs first.’
“The first reference is to last fall's vote on the Troubled Assets Relief Program, which Mr. Obama and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (Md.), chief of the DCCC, both supported -- and rightly so. The second is to a 2005 vote on emergency funds for Iraq that passed 386 to 43, again with Mr. Van Hollen in the majority -- again, rightly so. A spokeswoman for the DCCC says the ads are merely seeking to draw a contrast between past and present votes, and the White House has said that Mr. Obama isn't going to start refereeing others' commercials.
“Well, okay. But when he reaches out to Republicans for help on, say, Afghan reconstruction or the next slice of funds to rescue the banking system, he shouldn't be surprised if they reply, effectively, ‘How dumb do you think we are?’”
DCCC Dismisses Obama’s Calls for Bipartisanship
Washington Post Editorial: Politics, Still Strangled: Did the DCCC miss Mr. Obama's memo?
SPIN CYCLE:
Pelosi Proclaimed Congress Must “Work in a Bipartisan Way and Build Consensus”
“The challenges before us are formidable. Some can be solved immediately; others will take more time.
“To solve all of them, we must govern from the middle – reaching across the aisle to work in a bipartisan way and build consensus.
“We will work together with greatest civility.” – Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Speech at Bipartisan New Member Dinner, 11/17/08
RINSE CYCLE:
Dems Only Willing to Offer up More of the Same, DCCC Plays Partisan Politics as Usual
“PRESIDENT OBAMA says he wants a new era of bipartisanship. Among the areas where he is sure to need bipartisan help are foreign aid and fixing the nation's credit system. So why is the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee taking cheap shots at Republicans for their votes in those two areas?
“The hits come in radio ads that the DCCC began running yesterday against 28 Republican incumbents for their opposition to Mr. Obama's stimulus bill. That's fair enough; the stance on the bill is a major fault line between the two parties. But the ads also contrast the Republicans' opposition to stimulus with their votes ‘to bail out big banks,’ in some cases, and for ‘building new schools in Iraq,’ in others. ‘Times are tough,’ one ad says. ‘Tell [Rep.] Thad McCotter to put American jobs first.’
“The first reference is to last fall's vote on the Troubled Assets Relief Program, which Mr. Obama and Rep. Chris Van Hollen (Md.), chief of the DCCC, both supported -- and rightly so. The second is to a 2005 vote on emergency funds for Iraq that passed 386 to 43, again with Mr. Van Hollen in the majority -- again, rightly so. A spokeswoman for the DCCC says the ads are merely seeking to draw a contrast between past and present votes, and the White House has said that Mr. Obama isn't going to start refereeing others' commercials.
“Well, okay. But when he reaches out to Republicans for help on, say, Afghan reconstruction or the next slice of funds to rescue the banking system, he shouldn't be surprised if they reply, effectively, ‘How dumb do you think we are?’”
Wednesday, January 21, 2009
WSJ: GOP Calibrates Role as Opposition
Today's WSJ has a great piece on what's next for the GOP. Read it here, excerpts below.
WASHINGTON -- House Minority Leader John Boehner recently attacked the potential "wasteful spending" and "mountains of debt" in President Barack Obama's stimulus plan. A few days later, he warmly invited Mr. Obama to address House Republicans, saying, "We do not want partisan differences to stall achievement."
The contrast captures the balance confronting Republicans as they enter the opening act of what is likely to be a dynamic Democratic presidency. For the first time in eight years, Republicans don't occupy the White House, making Mr. Boehner and his Senate counterpart, Mitch McConnell, the party's leaders.
The November elections were widely seen as a rebuke to Republicans, and Mr. Obama has claimed the economic crisis as a mandate for action, leaving Messrs. Boehner and McConnell groping for the right blend of cooperation and defiance.
Republicans can't simply be "the party of 'no,'" Mr. Boehner, of Ohio, said in an interview this month, but must offer solutions to voters' problems. "We have to give the American people reasons to take a look at us," he said. Tuesday, Mr. Boehner issued a statement congratulating Mr. Obama on his inauguration, vowing to find "common ground with the President on solutions to rebuild our economy, strengthen American families, and keep our country safe."
...
Republicans say they will adopt different strategies for different bills. While they support elements of the stimulus plan, for example, they are dead-set against "card check" legislation making it easier for workers to unionize, and the parties are likely to wage a heated battle over that issue.
In all these fights, Republican leaders face a central challenge: re-energizing party loyalists while beginning to win back the centrists who just rejected them so decisively.
"You have to be a pragmatist," Mr. McConnell said. "I'm a right-of-center senator, but I'm also pragmatic. I have to deal with the art of the possible."
WASHINGTON -- House Minority Leader John Boehner recently attacked the potential "wasteful spending" and "mountains of debt" in President Barack Obama's stimulus plan. A few days later, he warmly invited Mr. Obama to address House Republicans, saying, "We do not want partisan differences to stall achievement."
The contrast captures the balance confronting Republicans as they enter the opening act of what is likely to be a dynamic Democratic presidency. For the first time in eight years, Republicans don't occupy the White House, making Mr. Boehner and his Senate counterpart, Mitch McConnell, the party's leaders.
The November elections were widely seen as a rebuke to Republicans, and Mr. Obama has claimed the economic crisis as a mandate for action, leaving Messrs. Boehner and McConnell groping for the right blend of cooperation and defiance.
Republicans can't simply be "the party of 'no,'" Mr. Boehner, of Ohio, said in an interview this month, but must offer solutions to voters' problems. "We have to give the American people reasons to take a look at us," he said. Tuesday, Mr. Boehner issued a statement congratulating Mr. Obama on his inauguration, vowing to find "common ground with the President on solutions to rebuild our economy, strengthen American families, and keep our country safe."
...
Republicans say they will adopt different strategies for different bills. While they support elements of the stimulus plan, for example, they are dead-set against "card check" legislation making it easier for workers to unionize, and the parties are likely to wage a heated battle over that issue.
In all these fights, Republican leaders face a central challenge: re-energizing party loyalists while beginning to win back the centrists who just rejected them so decisively.
"You have to be a pragmatist," Mr. McConnell said. "I'm a right-of-center senator, but I'm also pragmatic. I have to deal with the art of the possible."
Tuesday, January 20, 2009
What They Are Saying on President-Elect Barack Obama's Inauguration
Some great quotes in today's TC Palm:
"I did serve in Vietnam and the key to America is the peaceful transition of power and it is the one thing we do well, even when we have presidents and parties who fought like hell, even when we do it that way, we do it better than anybody else and that’s what makes it work.”--RPOF Assistant Treasurer Allen Miller
“We’re all Americans regardless of party, we’re going to welcome [Obama] as president and hope he does a good job. ...We’re already looking forward to the next four years.”--St. Lucie County REC Chairman Reece Parrish
“I know when I dropped my two kids off at school this morning, I think they’re going to show some of it in the classrooms, which I think is great. They’ll actually be witnessing history and not just studying it.”--Former State Representative Joe Negron
“He’s my president and I’m going to support my president. He’s going to good for the country and what is good for the county is what is important right now.”--Senator Ken Pruitt, R-Port St. Lucie.
"I did serve in Vietnam and the key to America is the peaceful transition of power and it is the one thing we do well, even when we have presidents and parties who fought like hell, even when we do it that way, we do it better than anybody else and that’s what makes it work.”--RPOF Assistant Treasurer Allen Miller
“We’re all Americans regardless of party, we’re going to welcome [Obama] as president and hope he does a good job. ...We’re already looking forward to the next four years.”--St. Lucie County REC Chairman Reece Parrish
“I know when I dropped my two kids off at school this morning, I think they’re going to show some of it in the classrooms, which I think is great. They’ll actually be witnessing history and not just studying it.”--Former State Representative Joe Negron
“He’s my president and I’m going to support my president. He’s going to good for the country and what is good for the county is what is important right now.”--Senator Ken Pruitt, R-Port St. Lucie.
Friday, December 12, 2008
Rangel Hits Obama Closer to Home
It certainly didn't take long for scandal to rear its ugly head in the new era of Democratic control. Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich saw to that, and in spectacular fashion.
But while most attention is fixed on the Blagojevich scandal -- coming as it does in President-elect Barack Obama's home state and replete as it is with enough tape-recorded talk of peddling a Senate seat, shaking down contributors and blackmailing journalists to make even FBI agents blush -- it may not be the most troublesome one for the new president.
His more vexing problem could turn out to be that other, quieter scandal dogging Democrats. That's the one involving Rep. Charles Rangel, head of the House Ways and Means Committee.
Read more from the Wall Street Journal here.
But while most attention is fixed on the Blagojevich scandal -- coming as it does in President-elect Barack Obama's home state and replete as it is with enough tape-recorded talk of peddling a Senate seat, shaking down contributors and blackmailing journalists to make even FBI agents blush -- it may not be the most troublesome one for the new president.
His more vexing problem could turn out to be that other, quieter scandal dogging Democrats. That's the one involving Rep. Charles Rangel, head of the House Ways and Means Committee.
Read more from the Wall Street Journal here.
Monday, December 1, 2008
Georgia on our Minds...
The folks at Politico sum up the short Obama coattails in GA, noting, "Democrats have given a lot of lip service to the Georgia runoff, but don’t seem to have put their money behind their man. USA Today reports that Republican Sen. Saxby Chambliss “raised $1.6 million in large contributions — amounts of $1,000 or more — from Nov. 13 through Nov. 21 compared with $462,000 for [Jim] Martin.” Outside groups have done even more, as the NRSC has put $2.5 million into the race, more than twice that of outside Democratic groups.
Wednesday, November 5, 2008
Democrats blew it in Florida
We couldn't have put it better ourselves! Adam Smith of the St. Pete Times explains the Florida Democrats' failure to capitalize on the Obama wave.
Democrats blew it in Florida?
The biggest surprise in Tuesday's results may be how poorly -- other than Barack Obama (all hail Steve Schale!) -- Florida Democrats performed despite the Obama juggernaut helping turn out votes.
They netted one Congressional seat and showed that Democrats can compete well in heavily Cuban-American districts. But despite the anti-GOP climate, they did not pick off a single incumbent Republican in the Legislature and ultimately may net just one state House seat. Two words: Pa Thetic.
And gloomy Republicans today can find plenty of reasons for solace: On Constitutional amendments, Floridians voted strongly to cut taxes, ban gay marriage and oppose tax increases for community colleges.
There's no real evidence of a Democratic tide in Florida.
Democrats blew it in Florida?
The biggest surprise in Tuesday's results may be how poorly -- other than Barack Obama (all hail Steve Schale!) -- Florida Democrats performed despite the Obama juggernaut helping turn out votes.
They netted one Congressional seat and showed that Democrats can compete well in heavily Cuban-American districts. But despite the anti-GOP climate, they did not pick off a single incumbent Republican in the Legislature and ultimately may net just one state House seat. Two words: Pa Thetic.
And gloomy Republicans today can find plenty of reasons for solace: On Constitutional amendments, Floridians voted strongly to cut taxes, ban gay marriage and oppose tax increases for community colleges.
There's no real evidence of a Democratic tide in Florida.
Wednesday, October 29, 2008
Tuesday, October 28, 2008
Saturday, October 25, 2008
Wednesday, October 22, 2008
Polls Show McCain Up in FL
Republicans are out-spent, out-staffed, out-registered, and out-advertised in Florida, but Florida voters see through the Obama hype and embrace the McCain-Palin message of keeping more tax dollars in our pockets instead of spreading the wealth around.
Mason Dixon shows McCain 46, Obama 45
Fox News/Rasmussen Reports Survey shows McCain 49, Obama 48
Mason Dixon shows McCain 46, Obama 45
Fox News/Rasmussen Reports Survey shows McCain 49, Obama 48
Tuesday, October 21, 2008
McCain: Obama Panders in FL, Shows Love to the Rays
"...I heard that Senator Obama was showing some love to the Rays down in Tampa Bay yesterday. Now, I'm not dumb enough to get mixed up in a World Series between swing states, but I think I may have detected a little pattern with Senator Obama. It's pretty simple really. When he's campaigning in Philadelphia, he roots for the Phillies, and when he's campaigning in Tampa Bay, he shows love to the Rays. It's kind of like the way he campaigns on tax cuts, but then votes for tax increases after he's elected. Or the way he says he backs the middle class and then goes and attacks Joe the Plumber after he's asked a tough question..."
-Remarks as prepared for delivery at the McCain-Palin 2008 rally in Bensalem, PA
-Remarks as prepared for delivery at the McCain-Palin 2008 rally in Bensalem, PA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
